Hi Guys,
But finally –
roughly two days ago – I finished it and sent it away for its second run
through and I thought I should finally write something. And this time the topic
was fairly obvious. Antediluvian writing!
Now I'm not
talking here about writing about the pre-flood times. (Though it is an interesting
idea.) Nor about the writing that was done before the flood. (Though I'm
pleased to report that I have one of the largest collections of pre-flood books
in existence with exactly zero books! One of which is entitled – “What's That
Big Wall Of Water Coming My Wa …!) I'm actually reflecting on my own writing
style – which may be a little archaic for want of a better term.
I always get a
bit nostalgic when my latest books away for editing. Especially when my editor
contacts me to tell me about the latest fashions which she thinks I should try
– in this case a white coat that buckles up at the back! But in this case my
nostalgia was brought on by reading some of the critiques done of another
fledgeling writer's work.
Now I've said
this before, and I'll undoubtedly say it again. Probably until I'm in my grave.
There is no right way to write a book! There are no rules of writing! Not every
book should be written with minimal description and character development and
constant page turning seat of your pants action! And those who give critiques
are giving you opinion – no more. The challenge for the writer is to decide
whether they agree with those opinions or not.
For me, I like
good long reads. I like a complicated world build, an involved plot, and deep
character work. My editor does a great job of curbing the worst of my excesses
– or else every book I wrote would be a thousand pages long! But always as I go
through the changes she's made, I sit there with a single question on my mind –
do I agree with each change? Sometimes I do and sometimes I don't.
And for all of
you out there going through the process of putting your work up for critique,
this is the same thing you need to do. Don't simply accept what others say. And
for the sake of your peace of mind, don't look at all the edits and think –
shit I'm a crap writer! I guarantee the same people could make just as many
edits on Tolstoy. And in any case this is not a business for the thin skinned.
So simply thank
people for their time and effort, and then go through all the comments with
with that one question on your mind. Do you agree? Or put another way – if you
do what they say will it still be the story you want to tell being told the way
you want to tell it?
Anyway, enough
whining from me. I've got to get back to writing. And this time I've got caught
up in a strange plot involving the missing Roman Ninth Legion, some Celts and a
few fae, an alternate world, and a mist that keeps carrying people away. If I
don't keep writing I won't know where the story is going! (People keep asking
me where I get my ideas. And quite frankly I'd like to know too – because some
of them baffle even me!)
So as always, be
good or don't get caught.
Cheers, Greg.